Explanation of #GamerGate's current identity, and evolution.

 To whom it may concern:

Those defined externally (Objectively) as Social Justice Warriors, Radical Feminists in opposition of status quo writing, and specifically those that identify themselves primarily as in opposition to amorphous group self identified as #GamerGate.

I am taking the time to write this for you, for the sake of your comprehension of what precisely the group was and has evolved into. However you interpret this: My goal is not to insult you – but to make an honest effort to help you understand, and at the very least demonstrating how there are reasonable that you are ignoring, which is why you are not solving anything.

Its really quite simple...

The group identifies under a core premise of [Ethics in (gaming) journalism]

However, upon engaging this matter: is has necessarily carried over

into the underlying presumed causes of the corruption.

Because the corruption in question surrounds favors for publicity, money and etc, in order to present a dishonest view of the matter on which you are reporting.

It is understandable that as an advertising firm, you would want to make paid placements and the profit resulting.

Of course this would not have been a problem, greed is expected.

However it was the retaliation that sealed your fate having drawn attention to the agenda of social justice infiltration into video game culture

This is by all measures a bad thing.

The pattern on using the hashtag has a powerful correlation with [Staying on topic]

While there are exceptions – Any of even a simplistic knowledge of social interaction and human behavior, knows this to be normal statistical out-liars in any society

Much like how most of society is law abiding, while a small fraction has a rebellious nature, leading ultimately to crime.

Again... this is elementary sociology.

The identity of #GamerGate continues to exist as an unofficial forum.

Essenitally because of these people having adopted it, they find themselves always having something in common.
This allows them to quickly bond in fascinating ways: That for some reason you one and only “Sociologist” that I can find.... has abolutely no interest in.

Which furthers my suspicion on the limits of her edcation.

The identity will continue ridiculing worthy topics

Generally doing so in peaceful snark – which will raise awareness about the problems of hyper liberal culture.

An issue that I never before considered: As I have always voted democrat

But I am a scientist first

Ideologue only accidentally.