Study finally proves Women are stupider than men. Click here to rage and share

((Disclaimer)) The following is written in experimental neuroplastic linguistic applied visual ascii formatting. Parental supervision is ill-advised...

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, or so im told. Others insist they are, but if they say something wrong, bad or harmful (“To people, emotionally”) they should not be allowed to say them.
… we call these people that believe in this manner… The Islamic State as sanctioned under Sharia Law of the Qur'an

Other people believe that if you say something that harms people, you should be entitled to the reception of social shaming practices, of which they say should be a legal practice…

that is until they discovered how they could not legally retaliate when getting doxxed (Social Shaming Tactic: Public Exposure of Identity) A tactic they were already well versed in and use.

→ We officially call these people [Advocates of Social Pseudo-justice]
Unofficially “Social Justice Warriors”

The Feminist Frequency…

was bound to enter into a videogame firestorm for attention - and so it happened.

The narrative of their context is not complex, nor is it even simple; It is [Hyper-Simple]

In fact so obvious, most people will dismiss the thought they have their own heads

→ “This isn’t what people think, this isn’t what I think.”
which is later reinforced by a trick of reverse psychology summed up in the following quote

Sarkesian: “... the more you believe you cannot be affected by media, the more likely you are to be affected…”

In truth that might be a paraphrase and not exact quote
for the moment im not looking it up: but she definitely said that point.

Now this trick JackinTosh played on us: It causes us to first think....
“This is not the way i look at women.”
or
“This isnt what playing videogames does to me…”
then causes us to question that, and make us think she must know something we dont…

and thus we (the viewer) experiences a guilt/sympathy response tied to the unintentional harm done to someone, as it is explained to us: In our many unconscious desires, choices, and behaviors…

This emphesis on subconscious or “unintentional things we do and want to do that oppression other cultures” leads us to believe that we are fully conditioned in a society in which we the privlaged excel while others fail.
Those of us who are more charitable come to that realization and are manipulated to throw away hard earned cash to the Feminist Frequency accounts - wherever they may be.

The truth is of course, that conducting a survey to prove or attempt to prove how denial of violent displays make you violent, or sexist, or… something.
does technically count as as “ “ Doing social sciences…” “

But it is the applied social sciences, that of political socioeconomics, the study and application of social technologies to sway group opinions.

Writing up a study to prove what you think, can be used to prove almost any assertion you have, pending you have the resources.

Here is how its done...

The general idea is carefully and confusingly wording several question in a certain way

The sad fact is, people will reference the study far more often than they will read the actual study.

Quoting a studys findings can be done in a single tweet, all of 10 seconds of time.

→ whereas reading a study… could take up to 3 whole minutes…

You can exploit this fact by artistic renderings of language or commonly referred to as
“questions be worded all confusing as hell”

The best format to exploit is a spectrum Q&A
this survey method uses a range of statements which assert some form of “I agree
to “I dont agree”
in a multiple choice
random order format.

One answer will usually be a clear absolute. clearly indicating a “no”
The rest will be a variation of “Yes. If (caveat)

The latter example can be later referenced as “Yes” in an → “According to studies, 70% of people agree…” format

→ Done

Now you have a study to sell, or were more likely contracted to do...

Next, the article uses the new reference as a study sanctioned by some non-scientific organization.
This organization is allowed to conduct any study at all with their own money under the first amendment because a survey study is simply a process of asking people questions…

Questions which are structured into an event
which take place at a site
→ A site like at a school.

A school which you plan to send your daughter to, or you yourself plan to go…

You then announce study done at X school in the title, of the article.

→ Show the results as proving how many men rape at the college (for example)

(Rape articles pay the most.)

After the target emotional response has been achieved in the reader

→ Commonly referred to as “Rage Share Clicking” or “Reblogs”

In which people share to seek attention, or to express outrage.

→ “Can you believe what these people do!”

This is why it works...
- Anger attracts the most social attention to a more general audience
- Sexual imagery is a “best seller” to men but does not work [as well/Easily] on female audiences, as female sexuality is biased in nonverbal behavior demonstrations, over physical biological presentation (teh sexy butts)

→ Women make up a greater majority of the internet population.

→ This also contributes to the necessity for new marketing techniques that deviate from physical sexuality and emotional manipulation is key.

Sexual Marketing Male →   With sexually manipulative marketing towards men, you will get a high rate of attention of an individual males, whom less often share content of sexual natures.

Sexual marketing Female → Sexual marketing to females is less successful, because female sexuality is heavily biased (Biased, not based) in nonverbal interactive behaviors.

info propagation →

When you target females as your target audience: You will not just attract the attention of her, but you will attract everything that she tells about it.

If the female’s attention of which youve acquired is a popular social internet entity
then you have acquired even more attention, potentially a sole propagator.

Females will, on average, have more social networking connections to more people than will males, and equally acquire more attention per user than a male would (on average)
As so, Females are the ideal target audience for most internet marketing and political campaigns

Using this complete method, your article will acquire maximal attention for maximum clicks.

((end))

#Note

All typos and grammatical errors have been retained to give the stupid something to "Correct" which results in an illusion of "Being good at something" causing a rush of dopamine and norepinephrine (feel good brain chemicals) which contributes to help reduce suicide rates among social justice warrior populations.

I am anti-suicide...

Explanation of #GamerGate's current identity, and evolution.

 To whom it may concern:

Those defined externally (Objectively) as Social Justice Warriors, Radical Feminists in opposition of status quo writing, and specifically those that identify themselves primarily as in opposition to amorphous group self identified as #GamerGate.

I am taking the time to write this for you, for the sake of your comprehension of what precisely the group was and has evolved into. However you interpret this: My goal is not to insult you – but to make an honest effort to help you understand, and at the very least demonstrating how there are reasonable that you are ignoring, which is why you are not solving anything.

Its really quite simple...

The group identifies under a core premise of [Ethics in (gaming) journalism]

However, upon engaging this matter: is has necessarily carried over

into the underlying presumed causes of the corruption.

Because the corruption in question surrounds favors for publicity, money and etc, in order to present a dishonest view of the matter on which you are reporting.

It is understandable that as an advertising firm, you would want to make paid placements and the profit resulting.

Of course this would not have been a problem, greed is expected.

However it was the retaliation that sealed your fate having drawn attention to the agenda of social justice infiltration into video game culture

This is by all measures a bad thing.

The pattern on using the hashtag has a powerful correlation with [Staying on topic]

While there are exceptions – Any of even a simplistic knowledge of social interaction and human behavior, knows this to be normal statistical out-liars in any society

Much like how most of society is law abiding, while a small fraction has a rebellious nature, leading ultimately to crime.

Again... this is elementary sociology.

The identity of #GamerGate continues to exist as an unofficial forum.

Essenitally because of these people having adopted it, they find themselves always having something in common.
This allows them to quickly bond in fascinating ways: That for some reason you one and only “Sociologist” that I can find.... has abolutely no interest in.

Which furthers my suspicion on the limits of her edcation.

The identity will continue ridiculing worthy topics

Generally doing so in peaceful snark – which will raise awareness about the problems of hyper liberal culture.

An issue that I never before considered: As I have always voted democrat

But I am a scientist first

Ideologue only accidentally.